| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Agent counterplan ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Agent counterplan
In policy debate, an agent counterplan is a counterplan that proposes to do affirmative's plan (or part of it) with another agent.〔Cheshire, David. (2003). (Debating Agent Specification ). ''Rostrum''. Retrieved December 30, 2005.〕 For example, if the affirmative plan were: "The USFG should send troops to Liberia" an agent counterplan would be "France should send troops to Liberia." Like most mainstream argument forms in policy debate, they are presumed to be legitimate, though it is possible for the affirmative to defeat them on the grounds that they are illegitimate by arguing that they are unfair, uneducational, or illogical. Because they make it possible for the negative to win without refuting most of the claims of the affirmative case (mooting much of the 1AC offense), they are a key component in many negative strategies.
Most affirmative's try to avoid domestic USFG agent counterplans (e.g., if the plan involves Congressional legislation, the negative might counterplan to have the president issue an executive order) by not specifying their agent beyond the United States federal government in their plan text. On international topics, international agent counterplans cannot be similarly avoided, although many consider them object fiat or otherwise theoretically suspect.
Some debate theorists (e.g., Lichtman and Rohrer; Korcok; Strait and Wallace) have argued the kind of fiat involved with these counterplans is inconsistent with the logic of decision making.〔Lichtman, A. & Rohrer, D. (1975). “A general theory of the counterplan,” Journal of the American Forensics Association, 12, 70-79.〕〔Korcok, M. M. (2002). “The decision-maker,” in Perspectives in controversy: Selected essays from Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, (ed. K. Broda-Bahm). New York: International Debate Education Association, pp. 241-264.〕〔Strait, L. P., & Wallace, B. (2007). (The Scope of Negative Fiat and the Logic of Decision Making. ) Debaters Research Guide, Wake Forest University Press, pp. A1-A7〕〔Strait, L. P., & Wallace, B. (2008). Academic debate as a decision-making game: Inculcating the virtue of practical wisdom. ''Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 29,'' 1-36.〕
==See also==
* Plan inclusive counterplan
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Agent counterplan」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|